Evaluating Vice President Kamala Harris as a Replacement for President Joe Biden: A Divisive Debate

Should Vice President Kamala Harris take over for President Joe Biden? The optics of her appointment to the highest office in the land have raised eyebrows, and some even question its legality. Adding to the controversy is the pre-announced selection and her appointment to the Supreme Court, drawing into question whether such decisions could be seen as discriminatory. This article explores various perspectives surrounding this debate, including the potential risks and benefits of Harris taking over for Biden.

A Controversial Appointment for Vice President Kamala Harris

The appointment of Vice President Kamala Harris was subject to intense scrutiny and criticism. Proponents argue that Harris's qualifications and experiences make her a strong successor, while critics question the legality and fairness of the appointment process. If a business managed to achieve similar practices, it would result in severe legal ramifications, such as heavy fines, jail time, and lawsuits.

Her gender and racial background were the primary factors that influenced her selection. The fact that all male candidates were excluded can be interpreted as discriminatory against men. Moreover, the appointment of Curtis S. (Kito) Jackson to the Supreme Court, mirroring the same controversial approach, led to further allegations of discrimination and raised the question of why such choices did not elicit widespread outrage. The case for her capabilities and qualifications notwithstanding, these constitutional and ethical concerns cannot be ignored.

Anti-Left Sentiment and Potential for Losing Base Support

Some political analysts predict that the Democratic Party might lose Joe Biden if they attempt to remove him from the office. However, Kamala Harris's immense base of support among Democrats makes her an unlikely choice for replacement. A recent poll showed that only 60% of Democrats believe she is ready to take on the position of President of the United States (POTUS). This figure falls far short of the 85-90% support needed to win a presidential election.

Despite her significant qualifications and experiences, Harris's role in the current administration has been largely underwhelming, with many referring to her as a "giggler." This lack of substantial achievements and contributions to the Biden administration may further hinder her chances of being the preferred replacement. The Democrats may need to consider finding two new candidates if they aim to have any realistic chance of winning.

Assessing Harris's Qualifications and Suitability

Would Kamala Harris be comfortable replacing Mr. Biden? To some, her background as a Vice President and her strong presence in Black and minority communities make her a suitable candidate. However, many question her readiness and ability to handle the critical responsibilities associated with the presidency. Arguments against her include concerns about her perceived age and physical state, which could impeded her effectiveness in office. Some argue that her age and vocal inflections would pose significant challenges in leading the country.

Despite these challenges, there is a belief that Kamala Harris might be the necessary candidate to defeat the "orange traitor." The confidence of the American people in the President is vital, and Joe Biden has recently lost a significant amount of it. This loss of confidence is a serious issue and cannot be underestimated. While the debate performance was terrible, the physical state of the President is a legitimate concern. Failure to address these issues could result in voter apathy leading to potential electoral defeat.

Considering these arguments, the critical point remains: can President Biden regain lost confidence? The loss of confidence in the President is a difficult hurdle to overcome. The debate performance was one factor, but the physical state and vocal changes of Joe Biden are also significant factors. Given the current situation, transitioning to Kamala Harris may be the only solution to ensure victory in the upcoming elections.

In conclusion, the debate over whether Vice President Kamala Harris should replace President Joe Biden is multifaceted, rooted in legal, political, and personal considerations. While the decision presents significant challenges, the need to defeat the "orange traitor" outweighs these concerns. It is imperative that the country unites to support and elect Kamala Harris to ensure the continuity of the Democratic agenda and the betterment of the nation.