Why Professors Still Require Paper Copies of Assignments: The Costs and Wastefulness

Introduction

Despite the overwhelming benefits of digital submissions and the increasing environmental consciousness, many professors still require students to submit their assignments in paper copies. This practice not only incurs financial costs but also contributes to the wasteful use of resources. This article explores the reasons for this persistence and discusses the growing movement towards digital submissions.

Traditional Format and Familiarity

Many faculty members have been teaching in a traditional format for years, and they find it more comfortable to handle physical papers. This familiarity enhances their teaching and grading experience, leading to a preference for paper assignments. According to MIT News (March 18, 2010), educators have used paper copies as a way to encourage students to take their work more seriously. They believe that the tactile experience of printing and submitting a paper gives it more weight.

Perceived Quality

Some professors believe that paper submissions promote higher-quality work, as students are more likely to pay extra attention to their assignments. The process of printing and handing in a physical copy can create a sense of responsibility and importance. This perception can lead to better assignment completion and quality.

Technical Issues

Another significant factor is the variability in students' access to technology. Some individuals may not have reliable internet connections or the necessary equipment to submit assignments digitally. Consequently, professors often require paper copies to ensure that all students can submit their work without facing technological barriers.

Grading Practices

Instructors may prefer to grade on paper because it is easier to annotate and provide feedback. They claim that physical copies facilitate a more straightforward and personal grading process. Marking up a paper assignment can be more intuitive and detailed compared to digital comments.

Institutional Policies

Lastly, some professors adhere to institutional or departmental policies that dictate the format of assignments. These guidelines can hinder their ability to adopt digital submissions, even if they recognize the benefits of digital platforms.

Concerns Over Plagiarism

Some educators believe that paper submissions can help reduce instances of plagiarism. They find it harder to share or copy physical documents compared to digital files. This rationale, however, is debatable as digital solutions can also mitigate plagiarism through online tools and software.

Modern Alternatives

Despite these reasons, a growing movement is pushing back against the use of paper assignments. Many institutions are actively encouraging the use of digital platforms to address sustainability concerns and the benefits of educational technology. Studies such as the one by David E. Pritchard at MIT have highlighted the negative impacts of lenient grading strategies on student performance.

High school teachers often use lenient grading methods to ensure students pass courses. According to the research, this approach can lead to low academic preparedness for college. The article from MIT News notes that a common strategy is to assign a grade of 50 for incomplete assignments, which inflates passing rates. This practice can create an illusion of academic success but does not prepare students for the rigors of higher education.

Conclusion

While there are valid reasons for requiring paper copies of assignments, the increasing awareness of the environmental impact and the benefits of digital submissions makes a compelling case for change. Institutions should encourage the use of digital platforms to not only reduce costs and waste but also enhance the educational experience for all students.